Labor monopsony in the United States -- The failure of antitrust -- Collusion -- Monopsony -- Mergers -- Noncompetes -- The limits of antitrust -- Employment and labor law : old and new directions -- The gig economy and independent contractors -- Conclusion : whither work?
More Books:
Language: en
Pages: 224
Pages: 224
Labor monopsony in the United States -- The failure of antitrust -- Collusion -- Monopsony -- Mergers -- Noncompetes -- The limits of antitrust -- Employment and labor law : old and new directions -- The gig economy and independent contractors -- Conclusion : whither work?
Language: en
Pages: 41
Pages: 41
In the last several years, economists have learned about an antitrust problem of vast scope. Far from approximating the conditions of perfect competition as long assumed, most labor markets are characterized by monopsony -- meaning that employers pay workers less than their productivity because workers lack a credible threat to
Language: en
Pages: 62
Pages: 62
In enacting the antitrust laws, Congress sought to prevent big businesses from maintaining and augmenting their power through collusion, mergers, and exclusionary and predatory practices and also aimed to preserve the ability of workers to act in concert. At times, the antitrust laws have significantly benefited ordinary Americans. Antitrust achievements
Language: en
Pages: 350
Pages: 350
Excerpt from Social Problems in Labor Relations: A Case Book The change of scale in business and industrial operations in this country during the last fifty years is a striking fact that has been generally Observed, but some of its social, as distinguished from its economic, implications have not received
Language: en
Pages:
Pages: